Skip to primary content

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Holding HOA Boards, Attorneys, and Management Companies Accountable

Arizona HOA Transparency Project

Main menu

  • Home
  • Dashboard
  • Law Firms
  • Attorneys
  • Judges
  • Cases
  • Violations
  • Associations
  • About

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Robert Tomisak v. Arrowhead Lakes Condominium Association

Posted on July 17, 2020 by jeremy@yourazhoaattorney.com

Case Summary

Case ID 20F-H2020055-REL
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2020-07-17
Administrative Law Judge Sondra J. Vanella
Outcome loss
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Robert Tomisak Counsel —
Respondent Arrowhead Lakes Condominium Association Counsel —

Alleged Violations

A.R.S. § 33-1258; CC&Rs Article 11, Section 4.8; Bylaws, Article 10.3

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge dismissed the petition, finding that the Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof that the Condominium Association violated its governing documents or state statute regarding record inspection, specifically because the Association did not possess and was not required to create a Membership Register containing unit owners' email addresses.

Why this result: Petitioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent violated the provisions of CC&Rs Section 11.4.8, Bylaws Section 10.3, or A.R.S. § 33-1158 (or § 33-1258) because the requested record (a Membership Register containing email addresses) did not exist, and the Association was not obligated to create it.

Key Issues & Findings

Refusal to provide access to the membership register (Owner Roster with emails)

Petitioner alleged the Respondent violated governing documents and statute by refusing access to the membership register containing email addresses. Respondent argued email addresses were protected 'personal records' under A.R.S. § 33-1258(B)(4). The ALJ found the Petitioner failed to prove a violation because the requested document (a Membership Register containing emails) did not exist, and Respondent had no obligation to create it.

Orders: The petition is dismissed and no action is required of Respondent.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: respondent_win

Cited:

  • A.R.S. § 33-1258
  • CC&Rs 11.4.8
  • Bylaws 10.3

Analytics Highlights

Topics: records inspection, membership roster, email addresses, HOA records, condominium association, A.R.S. 33-1258
Additional Citations:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.01
  • A.R.S. § 33-1258
  • A.R.S. § 33-1258(B)(4)
  • A.R.S. § 33-1158
  • CC&Rs 11.4.8
  • Bylaws 10.3
  • A.A.C. R2-19-119(A)
  • A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(1)
  • A.R.S. §32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.09

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

20F-H2020055-REL Decision – 807817.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:35:16 (107.3 KB)

Facebook Comments Box
This entry was posted in HOA Cases and tagged 2020, A.A.C. R2-19-119(A), A.A.C. R2-19-119(B)(1), A.R.S. § 32-2199.01, A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B), A.R.S. § 33-1158, A.R.S. § 33-1258, A.R.S. § 33-1258; CC&Rs Article 11, Section 4.8; Bylaws, Article 10.3, A.R.S. § 33-1258(B)(4), A.R.S. § 41-1092.09, A.R.S. 33-1258, Bylaws 10.3, CC&Rs 11.4.8, Condominium Association, email addresses, HOA Records, membership roster, records inspection, Refusal to provide access to the membership register (Owner Roster with emails), SJV by jeremy@yourazhoaattorney.com. Bookmark the permalink.
© 2024 Hound LLC. All rights reserved.