Case Summary
| Case ID | 21F-H2120012-REL |
|---|---|
| Agency | ADRE |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2020-12-13 |
| Administrative Law Judge | Kay A. Abramsohn |
| Outcome | none |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $500.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | Anthony & Karen Negrete | Counsel | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Sundance Ranch Homeowners Association | Counsel | Quinten Cupps, Esq. |
Alleged Violations
A.R.S. §§ 33-1803 and 33-1817(B)(2)(b)
Outcome Summary
The Respondent's Motion to Dismiss was granted because the statute cited by Petitioners (A.R.S. § 33-1817(B)(2)(b)) regarding mandatory design approval meetings applies only to the construction or rebuild of the 'main residential structure,' not to a shed.
Why this result: The key statute relied upon by Petitioners was deemed inapplicable to the construction of a shed.
Key Issues & Findings
Failure to provide opportunity to participate in design approval meeting for replacement shed
Petitioners alleged they were not given the opportunity to participate in a final design approval meeting for building a replacement shed on their property, pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-1817(B)(2)(b).
Orders: Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss is granted and Petitioners’ Petition is dismissed.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: respondent_win
- A.R.S. § 33-1803
- A.R.S. § 33-1817(B)(2)(b)
Analytics Highlights
- A.R.S. § 33-1803
- A.R.S. § 33-1817(B)(2)(b)
- A.R.S. Title 33, Chapter 16
- A.A.C. R2-19-119