Case Summary
| Case ID | 23F-H052-REL No. 23F-H064-REL |
|---|---|
| Agency | ADRE |
| Tribunal | OAH |
| Decision Date | 2023-08-28 |
| Administrative Law Judge | Brian Del Vecchio |
| Outcome | partial |
| Filing Fees Refunded | $1,000.00 |
| Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
| Petitioner | R.L. Whitmer | Counsel | — |
|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent | Hilton Casitas Council of Homeowners | Counsel | Emily H. Mann |
Alleged Violations
Article III Section 3 of the Bylaws of Hilton Casitas Council of Co-owners
ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1250(C)
Outcome Summary
The Administrative Law Judge affirmed the petition regarding the Bylaws violation (annual meeting held 27 days late, 23F-H052-REL) but denied the request for civil penalties. The ALJ dismissed the petition regarding the alleged statutory violation of in-person voting requirements (23F-H064-REL), finding Petitioner did not meet his burden of proof. Petitioner was reimbursed the $500 filing fee for the prevailing issue.
Why this result: Petitioner lost the statutory claim (23F-H064-REL) due to failure to provide sufficient evidence for a narrow interpretation of 'in person' voting. Petitioner failed to prove that civil penalties were warranted for the Bylaws violation (23F-H052-REL).
Key Issues & Findings
Failure to hold the annual meeting prior to March 31, 2023 (23F-H052-REL)
Petitioner alleged Respondent failed to hold the annual meeting by the Bylaws' deadline of March 31, 2023. Respondent stipulated that the meeting, held on April 27, 2023, was late, constituting a violation.
Orders: Respondent violated Article III Section 3 of the Bylaws; Petition affirmed. Petitioner was denied civil penalties but was reimbursed the $500.00 filing fee.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes
Disposition: petitioner_win
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02
Alleged violation for failing to allow in-person voting (23F-H064-REL)
Petitioner alleged Respondent violated the statute by allowing voting only through video conferencing and failing to provide an opportunity for in-person voting. The ALJ found Petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support a narrow interpretation of 'in person' that excludes remote video attendance.
Orders: Respondent did not violate ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1250(C). Petition dismissed.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: respondent_win
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1250(C)
Analytics Highlights
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1250(C)
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.05
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2102
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.01(A)
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.01(D)
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 41-1092 et seq.
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 41-1092.09