Case Summary
Case ID | 21F-H2120005-REL |
---|---|
Agency | ADRE |
Tribunal | OAH |
Decision Date | 2020-11-20 |
Administrative Law Judge | Thomas Shedden |
Outcome | partial |
Filing Fees Refunded | $500.00 |
Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
Petitioner | Donald S Fern & Judith A. Hedges | Counsel | Lance Leslie |
---|---|---|---|
Respondent | San Ignacio Heights, Inc. | Counsel | Michael S. Shupe |
Alleged Violations
CC&R Article VI(D)
Outcome Summary
Petitioners were the prevailing party because the Respondent acknowledged violating the CC&Rs by approving the pergola. Respondent was ordered to refund the $500.00 filing fee, but the request for a civil penalty was denied.
Key Issues & Findings
View Obstruction by Pergola Approval
Petitioners alleged that Respondent, by granting approval in February 2018 for the construction of a pergola on lot 47, violated the CC&Rs requirement that an unobstructed view of the Santa Rita Mountains be maintained for owners of View Lots (Lot 46) and sought a civil penalty.
Orders: Respondent acknowledged the violation, rescinded the pergola approval prior to the Notice of Hearing, and was ordered to pay Petitioners the $500.00 filing fee. A civil penalty was sought but denied.
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes
Disposition: petitioner_win
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. Title 32, Ch. 20, Art. 11
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02(A)
Analytics Highlights
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. Title 32, Ch. 20, Art. 11
- ARIZ. ADMIN. CODE § R2-19-119
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02(A)
- BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 1373 (10th ed. 2014)