Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) v. Desert Mountain Master

Case Summary

Case ID 21F-H2121055-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2022-01-31
Administrative Law Judge Velva Moses-Thompson
Outcome loss
Filing Fees Refunded $500.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) Counsel
Respondent Desert Mountain Master Association Counsel Mark K. Sahl, Esq.

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge vacated the hearing from the docket because the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew.

Why this result: The Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the request for hearing, leading to the matter being vacated from the docket.

Key Issues & Findings

statute

The party requesting the hearing voluntarily withdrew the matter.

Orders: The matter was vacated from the docket of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes

Disposition: respondent_win

Analytics Highlights

Topics: voluntary withdrawal, vacated hearing, continuance granted

Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) v. Desert Mountain Master

Case Summary

Case ID 21F-H2121055-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2022-01-31
Administrative Law Judge Velva Moses-Thompson
Outcome loss
Filing Fees Refunded $500.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) Counsel
Respondent Desert Mountain Master Association Counsel Mark K. Sahl, Esq.

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge vacated the hearing from the docket because the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew.

Why this result: The Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the request for hearing, leading to the matter being vacated from the docket.

Key Issues & Findings

statute

The party requesting the hearing voluntarily withdrew the matter.

Orders: The matter was vacated from the docket of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes

Disposition: respondent_win

Analytics Highlights

Topics: voluntary withdrawal, vacated hearing, continuance granted

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 909217.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (113.1 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 934279.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (49.2 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 934302.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (8.1 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 942918.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (42.0 KB)

Jeffrey Kreitzberg vs. Arcadia Spring Townhomes Unit 1

Case Summary

Case ID «Matter Matter ID»
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 1996-07-04
Administrative Law Judge «Professional Full Name»
Outcome complete
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner «Client Contact Full Name» Counsel
Respondent «Client Contact Company» Counsel

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Key Issues & Findings

statute

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1717040-REL Decision – 634939.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T06:52:02 (39.0 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1717040-REL


Briefing on the Administrative Law Judge Decision Document

Executive Summary

The source material provides a standardized template for an “Administrative Law Judge Decision” issued by the Office of Administrative Hearings located in Phoenix, Arizona. The document is structured to formalize the outcome of an administrative hearing, delineating key procedural and case-specific information. Its core components include sections for case identification, hearing details, participant appearances, and the presiding judge’s official signature. A notable feature is the explicit protocol for electronic transmission of the final decision to a designated client contact, indicating a formalized digital workflow. The template utilizes a series of placeholders to be populated with specific details for each case.

Document Origin and Jurisdiction

The document template originates from a specific governmental body, establishing its context and authority within an administrative legal framework.

Issuing Authority: Office of Administrative Hearings

Physical Address: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

This information firmly places the document within the purview of this Arizona-based administrative office.

Core Components of the Decision Template

The template is systematically organized to ensure all critical information for a legal decision is captured and presented clearly.

1. Case Identification

The header section is designed to uniquely identify the matter being adjudicated.

Case Number: The document includes a field for a unique identifier, denoted as No. «Matter Matter ID».

Matter Notes: A placeholder, «Matter Notes», is provided at the top, likely for a case title, subject matter, or other essential preliminary information.

2. Hearing and Participant Details

The template formalizes the record of the hearing and its attendees.

Hearing Information: A dedicated HEARING: section is included to record the specifics of the hearing itself, such as the date and nature of the proceedings.

Appearances: A section labeled APPEARANCES: is designated for listing the parties and representatives who were present.

Presiding Judge: The decision is attributed to a specific judge, identified by the placeholder ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: «Professional Full Name».

3. Decision and Execution

The concluding section of the template is structured for the formal issuance and authentication of the judge’s decision.

Date of Decision: The document is dated with the line: Done this day, «Today: July 4, 1996».

Judge’s Signature: A formal signature line is provided for the judge: /s/ «Professional Full Name» Administrative Law Judge.

4. Transmission Protocol

The template includes explicit instructions for the document’s dissemination after being finalized.

Method of Delivery: The document specifies it is “Transmitted electronically to:”.

Recipient Information: It contains placeholders to detail the recipient, including their full name («Client Contact Full Name»), title («Client Contact Title»), and organization («Client Contact Company»).

Analysis of Placeholder Fields

The template’s functionality relies on a series of placeholder fields, which reveal the specific data points required to complete a formal decision document.

Placeholder Field

Inferred Purpose

«Matter Notes»

To be replaced with the case title, subject, or other key contextual notes.

«Matter Matter ID»

The unique docket or case number assigned to the administrative matter.

«Professional Full Name»

The full name of the presiding Administrative Law Judge; used in two locations.

«Today: July 4, 1996»

The specific date on which the judge finalizes and issues the decision.

«Client Contact Full Name»

The full name of the primary contact person receiving the decision.

«Client Contact Title»

The professional title of the recipient.

«Client Contact Company»

The company or organization to which the recipient belongs.


Jeffrey Kreitzberg vs. Arcadia Spring Townhomes Unit 1

Case Summary

Case ID «Matter Matter ID»
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 1996-07-04
Administrative Law Judge «Professional Full Name»
Outcome complete
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner «Client Contact Full Name» Counsel
Respondent «Client Contact Company» Counsel

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Key Issues & Findings

statute

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1717040-REL Decision – 634939.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T06:58:32 (39.0 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1717040-REL


Briefing on the Administrative Law Judge Decision Document

Executive Summary

The source material provides a standardized template for an “Administrative Law Judge Decision” issued by the Office of Administrative Hearings located in Phoenix, Arizona. The document is structured to formalize the outcome of an administrative hearing, delineating key procedural and case-specific information. Its core components include sections for case identification, hearing details, participant appearances, and the presiding judge’s official signature. A notable feature is the explicit protocol for electronic transmission of the final decision to a designated client contact, indicating a formalized digital workflow. The template utilizes a series of placeholders to be populated with specific details for each case.

Document Origin and Jurisdiction

The document template originates from a specific governmental body, establishing its context and authority within an administrative legal framework.

Issuing Authority: Office of Administrative Hearings

Physical Address: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

This information firmly places the document within the purview of this Arizona-based administrative office.

Core Components of the Decision Template

The template is systematically organized to ensure all critical information for a legal decision is captured and presented clearly.

1. Case Identification

The header section is designed to uniquely identify the matter being adjudicated.

Case Number: The document includes a field for a unique identifier, denoted as No. «Matter Matter ID».

Matter Notes: A placeholder, «Matter Notes», is provided at the top, likely for a case title, subject matter, or other essential preliminary information.

2. Hearing and Participant Details

The template formalizes the record of the hearing and its attendees.

Hearing Information: A dedicated HEARING: section is included to record the specifics of the hearing itself, such as the date and nature of the proceedings.

Appearances: A section labeled APPEARANCES: is designated for listing the parties and representatives who were present.

Presiding Judge: The decision is attributed to a specific judge, identified by the placeholder ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: «Professional Full Name».

3. Decision and Execution

The concluding section of the template is structured for the formal issuance and authentication of the judge’s decision.

Date of Decision: The document is dated with the line: Done this day, «Today: July 4, 1996».

Judge’s Signature: A formal signature line is provided for the judge: /s/ «Professional Full Name» Administrative Law Judge.

4. Transmission Protocol

The template includes explicit instructions for the document’s dissemination after being finalized.

Method of Delivery: The document specifies it is “Transmitted electronically to:”.

Recipient Information: It contains placeholders to detail the recipient, including their full name («Client Contact Full Name»), title («Client Contact Title»), and organization («Client Contact Company»).

Analysis of Placeholder Fields

The template’s functionality relies on a series of placeholder fields, which reveal the specific data points required to complete a formal decision document.

Placeholder Field

Inferred Purpose

«Matter Notes»

To be replaced with the case title, subject, or other key contextual notes.

«Matter Matter ID»

The unique docket or case number assigned to the administrative matter.

«Professional Full Name»

The full name of the presiding Administrative Law Judge; used in two locations.

«Today: July 4, 1996»

The specific date on which the judge finalizes and issues the decision.

«Client Contact Full Name»

The full name of the primary contact person receiving the decision.

«Client Contact Title»

The professional title of the recipient.

«Client Contact Company»

The company or organization to which the recipient belongs.


Jeffrey Kreitzberg vs. Arcadia Spring Townhomes Unit 1

Case Summary

Case ID «Matter Matter ID»
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 1996-07-04
Administrative Law Judge «Professional Full Name»
Outcome complete
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner «Client Contact Full Name» Counsel
Respondent «Client Contact Company» Counsel

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Key Issues & Findings

statute

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1717040-REL Decision – 634939.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T07:02:48 (39.0 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1717040-REL


Briefing on the Administrative Law Judge Decision Document

Executive Summary

The source material provides a standardized template for an “Administrative Law Judge Decision” issued by the Office of Administrative Hearings located in Phoenix, Arizona. The document is structured to formalize the outcome of an administrative hearing, delineating key procedural and case-specific information. Its core components include sections for case identification, hearing details, participant appearances, and the presiding judge’s official signature. A notable feature is the explicit protocol for electronic transmission of the final decision to a designated client contact, indicating a formalized digital workflow. The template utilizes a series of placeholders to be populated with specific details for each case.

Document Origin and Jurisdiction

The document template originates from a specific governmental body, establishing its context and authority within an administrative legal framework.

Issuing Authority: Office of Administrative Hearings

Physical Address: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

This information firmly places the document within the purview of this Arizona-based administrative office.

Core Components of the Decision Template

The template is systematically organized to ensure all critical information for a legal decision is captured and presented clearly.

1. Case Identification

The header section is designed to uniquely identify the matter being adjudicated.

Case Number: The document includes a field for a unique identifier, denoted as No. «Matter Matter ID».

Matter Notes: A placeholder, «Matter Notes», is provided at the top, likely for a case title, subject matter, or other essential preliminary information.

2. Hearing and Participant Details

The template formalizes the record of the hearing and its attendees.

Hearing Information: A dedicated HEARING: section is included to record the specifics of the hearing itself, such as the date and nature of the proceedings.

Appearances: A section labeled APPEARANCES: is designated for listing the parties and representatives who were present.

Presiding Judge: The decision is attributed to a specific judge, identified by the placeholder ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: «Professional Full Name».

3. Decision and Execution

The concluding section of the template is structured for the formal issuance and authentication of the judge’s decision.

Date of Decision: The document is dated with the line: Done this day, «Today: July 4, 1996».

Judge’s Signature: A formal signature line is provided for the judge: /s/ «Professional Full Name» Administrative Law Judge.

4. Transmission Protocol

The template includes explicit instructions for the document’s dissemination after being finalized.

Method of Delivery: The document specifies it is “Transmitted electronically to:”.

Recipient Information: It contains placeholders to detail the recipient, including their full name («Client Contact Full Name»), title («Client Contact Title»), and organization («Client Contact Company»).

Analysis of Placeholder Fields

The template’s functionality relies on a series of placeholder fields, which reveal the specific data points required to complete a formal decision document.

Placeholder Field

Inferred Purpose

«Matter Notes»

To be replaced with the case title, subject, or other key contextual notes.

«Matter Matter ID»

The unique docket or case number assigned to the administrative matter.

«Professional Full Name»

The full name of the presiding Administrative Law Judge; used in two locations.

«Today: July 4, 1996»

The specific date on which the judge finalizes and issues the decision.

«Client Contact Full Name»

The full name of the primary contact person receiving the decision.

«Client Contact Title»

The professional title of the recipient.

«Client Contact Company»

The company or organization to which the recipient belongs.


Jeffrey Kreitzberg vs. Arcadia Spring Townhomes Unit 1

Case Summary

Case ID «Matter Matter ID»
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 1996-07-04
Administrative Law Judge «Professional Full Name»
Outcome complete
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner «Client Contact Full Name» Counsel
Respondent «Client Contact Company» Counsel

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Key Issues & Findings

statute

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1717040-REL Decision – 634939.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:31:54 (39.0 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1717040-REL


Briefing on the Administrative Law Judge Decision Document

Executive Summary

The source material provides a standardized template for an “Administrative Law Judge Decision” issued by the Office of Administrative Hearings located in Phoenix, Arizona. The document is structured to formalize the outcome of an administrative hearing, delineating key procedural and case-specific information. Its core components include sections for case identification, hearing details, participant appearances, and the presiding judge’s official signature. A notable feature is the explicit protocol for electronic transmission of the final decision to a designated client contact, indicating a formalized digital workflow. The template utilizes a series of placeholders to be populated with specific details for each case.

Document Origin and Jurisdiction

The document template originates from a specific governmental body, establishing its context and authority within an administrative legal framework.

Issuing Authority: Office of Administrative Hearings

Physical Address: 1740 West Adams Street, Lower Level, Phoenix, Arizona 85007

This information firmly places the document within the purview of this Arizona-based administrative office.

Core Components of the Decision Template

The template is systematically organized to ensure all critical information for a legal decision is captured and presented clearly.

1. Case Identification

The header section is designed to uniquely identify the matter being adjudicated.

Case Number: The document includes a field for a unique identifier, denoted as No. «Matter Matter ID».

Matter Notes: A placeholder, «Matter Notes», is provided at the top, likely for a case title, subject matter, or other essential preliminary information.

2. Hearing and Participant Details

The template formalizes the record of the hearing and its attendees.

Hearing Information: A dedicated HEARING: section is included to record the specifics of the hearing itself, such as the date and nature of the proceedings.

Appearances: A section labeled APPEARANCES: is designated for listing the parties and representatives who were present.

Presiding Judge: The decision is attributed to a specific judge, identified by the placeholder ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: «Professional Full Name».

3. Decision and Execution

The concluding section of the template is structured for the formal issuance and authentication of the judge’s decision.

Date of Decision: The document is dated with the line: Done this day, «Today: July 4, 1996».

Judge’s Signature: A formal signature line is provided for the judge: /s/ «Professional Full Name» Administrative Law Judge.

4. Transmission Protocol

The template includes explicit instructions for the document’s dissemination after being finalized.

Method of Delivery: The document specifies it is “Transmitted electronically to:”.

Recipient Information: It contains placeholders to detail the recipient, including their full name («Client Contact Full Name»), title («Client Contact Title»), and organization («Client Contact Company»).

Analysis of Placeholder Fields

The template’s functionality relies on a series of placeholder fields, which reveal the specific data points required to complete a formal decision document.

Placeholder Field

Inferred Purpose

«Matter Notes»

To be replaced with the case title, subject, or other key contextual notes.

«Matter Matter ID»

The unique docket or case number assigned to the administrative matter.

«Professional Full Name»

The full name of the presiding Administrative Law Judge; used in two locations.

«Today: July 4, 1996»

The specific date on which the judge finalizes and issues the decision.

«Client Contact Full Name»

The full name of the primary contact person receiving the decision.

«Client Contact Title»

The professional title of the recipient.

«Client Contact Company»

The company or organization to which the recipient belongs.