Case Summary
Case ID | 23F-H054-REL |
---|---|
Agency | ADRE |
Tribunal | OAH |
Decision Date | 2023-07-28 |
Administrative Law Judge | Adam D. Stone |
Outcome | loss |
Filing Fees Refunded | $500.00 |
Civil Penalties | $0.00 |
Parties & Counsel
Petitioner | Felicia Woodward | Counsel | — |
---|---|---|---|
Respondent | The Pointe South Mountain Residential Association | Counsel | Jonathan D. Ebertshauser |
Alleged Violations
ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1804
Outcome Summary
The Administrative Law Judge denied the single-issue petition, concluding that the Petitioner failed to prove the Association violated A.R.S. § 33-1804(D). The ALJ found that the gathering was a 'workshop' and not necessarily a formal 'meeting of the board of directors,' and further found that the Petitioner had received sufficient notice regardless.
Why this result: Petitioner failed to meet the burden of proof required by a preponderance of the evidence for the alleged violation of A.R.S. § 33-1804(D). The tribunal determined the meeting was advertised as a workshop and not a statutory board meeting, and the Petitioner had timely opened the notice email a week prior.
Key Issues & Findings
Petitioner alleges the Respondent has violated A.R.S. § 33-1804 by holding a meeting that 'had not been properly noticed…'
Petitioner alleged that the March 14, 2023 meeting was not properly noticed because customary channels (email, calendar, sandwich boards) were not used, and the notice provided did not include the meeting location. Respondent argued notice was given through email survey and the community calendar, meeting the statutory requirements, and that the event was a workshop.
Orders: Petitioner's petition was denied. Respondent shall not reimburse Petitioner's filing fee pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(A).
Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: No
Disposition: respondent_win
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1804(D)
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02(A)
Analytics Highlights
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 33-1804
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.02
- ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 32-2199.01