Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) v. Desert Mountain Master

Case Summary

Case ID 21F-H2121055-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2022-01-31
Administrative Law Judge Velva Moses-Thompson
Outcome loss
Filing Fees Refunded $500.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) Counsel
Respondent Desert Mountain Master Association Counsel Mark K. Sahl, Esq.

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge vacated the hearing from the docket because the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew.

Why this result: The Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the request for hearing, leading to the matter being vacated from the docket.

Key Issues & Findings

statute

The party requesting the hearing voluntarily withdrew the matter.

Orders: The matter was vacated from the docket of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes

Disposition: respondent_win

Analytics Highlights

Topics: voluntary withdrawal, vacated hearing, continuance granted

Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) v. Desert Mountain Master

Case Summary

Case ID 21F-H2121055-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2022-01-31
Administrative Law Judge Velva Moses-Thompson
Outcome loss
Filing Fees Refunded $500.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Nicole Armsby (NICDON 10663 LLC) Counsel
Respondent Desert Mountain Master Association Counsel Mark K. Sahl, Esq.

Alleged Violations

No violations listed

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge vacated the hearing from the docket because the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew.

Why this result: The Petitioner voluntarily withdrew the request for hearing, leading to the matter being vacated from the docket.

Key Issues & Findings

statute

The party requesting the hearing voluntarily withdrew the matter.

Orders: The matter was vacated from the docket of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $500.00, Fee refunded: Yes

Disposition: respondent_win

Analytics Highlights

Topics: voluntary withdrawal, vacated hearing, continuance granted

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 909217.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (113.1 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 934279.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (49.2 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 934302.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (8.1 KB)

21F-H2121055-REL Decision – 942918.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:37:25 (42.0 KB)

Marc Archer v. PMPE Community Association, Inc.

Case Summary

Case ID 20F-H2020063-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2021-03-16
Administrative Law Judge Tammy L. Eigenheer
Outcome none
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Marc Archer Counsel
Respondent PMPE Community Association, Inc. Counsel Nicholas Nogami, Esq.

Alleged Violations

A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge issued an Order Vacating Hearing after the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew his request for rehearing.

Key Issues & Findings

Request for Rehearing Withdrawal

Petitioner requested a rehearing based on actions taken by the Respondent after the initial decision. When informed that a rehearing could only address matters occurring prior to the initial petition filing, Petitioner chose to withdraw the request for rehearing and stated intent to file a new petition challenging Respondent’s denial of his submission to build an addition to his house.

Orders: The hearing in this matter is vacated from the calendar of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: dismissed

Cited:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Rehearing, Withdrawal, Vacated Hearing, Procedural
Additional Citations:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Marc Archer v. PMPE Community Association, Inc.

Case Summary

Case ID 20F-H2020063-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2021-03-16
Administrative Law Judge Tammy L. Eigenheer
Outcome none
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Marc Archer Counsel
Respondent PMPE Community Association, Inc. Counsel Nicholas Nogami, Esq.

Alleged Violations

A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge issued an Order Vacating Hearing after the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew his request for rehearing.

Key Issues & Findings

Request for Rehearing Withdrawal

Petitioner requested a rehearing based on actions taken by the Respondent after the initial decision. When informed that a rehearing could only address matters occurring prior to the initial petition filing, Petitioner chose to withdraw the request for rehearing and stated intent to file a new petition challenging Respondent’s denial of his submission to build an addition to his house.

Orders: The hearing in this matter is vacated from the calendar of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: dismissed

Cited:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Rehearing, Withdrawal, Vacated Hearing, Procedural
Additional Citations:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

20F-H2020063-REL Decision – 864308.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T07:12:43 (52.9 KB)

20F-H2020063-REL Decision – 864361.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T07:12:43 (8.2 KB)

Marc Archer v. PMPE Community Association, Inc.

Case Summary

Case ID 20F-H2020063-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2021-03-16
Administrative Law Judge Tammy L. Eigenheer
Outcome none
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Marc Archer Counsel
Respondent PMPE Community Association, Inc. Counsel Nicholas Nogami, Esq.

Alleged Violations

A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)

Outcome Summary

The Administrative Law Judge issued an Order Vacating Hearing after the Petitioner voluntarily withdrew his request for rehearing.

Key Issues & Findings

Request for Rehearing Withdrawal

Petitioner requested a rehearing based on actions taken by the Respondent after the initial decision. When informed that a rehearing could only address matters occurring prior to the initial petition filing, Petitioner chose to withdraw the request for rehearing and stated intent to file a new petition challenging Respondent’s denial of his submission to build an addition to his house.

Orders: The hearing in this matter is vacated from the calendar of the Office of Administrative Hearings.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: dismissed

Cited:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Rehearing, Withdrawal, Vacated Hearing, Procedural
Additional Citations:

  • A.R.S. § 32-2199.02(B)
  • A.R.S. § 41-1092.08(H)
  • A.R.S. § 12-904(A)

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

20F-H2020063-REL Decision – 864308.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:35:31 (52.9 KB)

20F-H2020063-REL Decision – 864361.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:35:31 (8.2 KB)

Was Paul W Herbert Now Brian C. Herbert vs. Blackstone at Vistancia

Case Summary

Case ID 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2018-01-03
Administrative Law Judge Diane Mihalsky
Outcome neutral
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Brian C. Herbert Counsel Jeffrey D. Harris
Respondent Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association Counsel Stewart F. Salwin

Alleged Violations

A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Outcome Summary

The case was resolved by settlement between the parties before adjudication, leading to the vacation of the scheduled hearing and remand to the ADRE.

Key Issues & Findings

Resolution by Settlement

The parties reached a settlement, resulting in a motion to vacate the hearing on the merits.

Orders: ORDER VACATING HEARING; matter remanded to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for further action.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: settlement

Cited:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Settlement, Vacated Hearing, HOA Dispute
Additional Citations:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Paul Herbert vs. Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Case Summary

Case ID 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2018-01-03
Administrative Law Judge Diane Mihalsky
Outcome neutral
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Brian C. Herbert Counsel Jeffrey D. Harris
Respondent Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association Counsel Stewart F. Salwin

Alleged Violations

A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Outcome Summary

The case was resolved by settlement between the parties before adjudication, leading to the vacation of the scheduled hearing and remand to the ADRE.

Key Issues & Findings

Resolution by Settlement

The parties reached a settlement, resulting in a motion to vacate the hearing on the merits.

Orders: ORDER VACATING HEARING; matter remanded to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for further action.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: settlement

Cited:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Settlement, Vacated Hearing, HOA Dispute
Additional Citations:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1817002-REL Decision – 609956.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-08T07:02:56 (51.3 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1817002-REL


Briefing on Case No. 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG: Herbert v. Blackstone at Vistancia

Executive Summary

This briefing details the resolution of case number 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG, a dispute between Petitioner Brian C. Herbert and Respondent Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association. The central development is that the parties reached a settlement, leading their attorneys to jointly file a motion to vacate the scheduled hearing. On January 3, 2018, Administrative Law Judge Diane Mihalsky of the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings granted this motion. The hearing scheduled for January 5, 2018, was officially vacated, and the case was remanded to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for subsequent action.

Case Overview

Case Number: 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG

Forum: The Office of Administrative Hearings, Phoenix, Arizona

Petitioner: Brian C. Herbert

Respondent: Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Presiding Judge: Diane Mihalsky, Administrative Law Judge

Key Development: Settlement and Hearing Vacation

The primary catalyst for the case’s disposition was a mutual agreement between the parties.

Settlement Reached: The document explicitly states that the parties “have reached a settlement.”

Joint Motion: Following the settlement, the attorneys for both the Petitioner and the Respondent filed a joint motion to vacate the hearing on the merits of the case.

Hearing Canceled: The order formally vacates the “continued hearing that had been scheduled on January 5, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.”

Judicial Orders and Disposition

On January 3, 2018, Judge Diane Mihalsky issued two definitive orders that concluded the proceedings at the Office of Administrative Hearings:

1. Order to Vacate: The first order vacates the hearing scheduled for January 5, 2018. The document states: “IT IS ORDERED vacating the continued hearing that had been scheduled on January 5, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.”

2. Order to Remand: The second order remands, or sends back, the matter to a different state body for final processing. It specifies: “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED remanding this matter under A.A.C. R2-19-111(3) to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for further action.”

Parties and Legal Representation

The following table details the key individuals and firms involved in the legal matter.

Name/Entity

Legal Counsel

Law Firm

Contact Information

Petitioner

Brian C. Herbert

Jeffrey D. Harris, Esq.

Titus Brueckner & Levine, PLC

jharris@tbl-law.com
8355 East Hartford Drive, Suite 200, Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Respondent

Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Stewart F. Salwin, Esq.
Lydia A. Peirce Linsmeier, Esq.

Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen, PLC

stewart@carpenterhazlewood.com
Lydia.Linsmeier@carpenterhazlewood.com
1400 E. Southern Ave., Suite 400, Tempe, AZ 85282

Administrative Details

Order Date: The order was issued on January 3, 2018.

Transmission: The document was transmitted on January 3, 2018, by “M.Aguirre” via mail, email, or facsimile.

Recipients of the Order:

Arizona Department of Real Estate:

▪ Judy Lowe, Commissioner

▪ Additional staff: jlowe@azre.gov, LDettorre@azre.gov, AHansen@azre.gov, djones@azre.gov, DGardner@azre.gov, ncano@azre.gov

Legal Counsel: All attorneys listed in the table above.


Paul Herbert vs. Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Case Summary

Case ID 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG
Agency ADRE
Tribunal OAH
Decision Date 2018-01-03
Administrative Law Judge Diane Mihalsky
Outcome neutral
Filing Fees Refunded $0.00
Civil Penalties $0.00

Parties & Counsel

Petitioner Brian C. Herbert Counsel Jeffrey D. Harris
Respondent Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association Counsel Stewart F. Salwin

Alleged Violations

A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Outcome Summary

The case was resolved by settlement between the parties before adjudication, leading to the vacation of the scheduled hearing and remand to the ADRE.

Key Issues & Findings

Resolution by Settlement

The parties reached a settlement, resulting in a motion to vacate the hearing on the merits.

Orders: ORDER VACATING HEARING; matter remanded to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for further action.

Filing fee: $0.00, Fee refunded: No

Disposition: settlement

Cited:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Analytics Highlights

Topics: Settlement, Vacated Hearing, HOA Dispute
Additional Citations:

  • A.A.C. R2-19-111(3)

Audio Overview

Decision Documents

18F-H1817002-REL Decision – 609956.pdf

Uploaded 2025-10-09T03:31:57 (51.3 KB)





Briefing Doc – 18F-H1817002-REL


Briefing on Case No. 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG: Herbert v. Blackstone at Vistancia

Executive Summary

This briefing details the resolution of case number 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG, a dispute between Petitioner Brian C. Herbert and Respondent Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association. The central development is that the parties reached a settlement, leading their attorneys to jointly file a motion to vacate the scheduled hearing. On January 3, 2018, Administrative Law Judge Diane Mihalsky of the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings granted this motion. The hearing scheduled for January 5, 2018, was officially vacated, and the case was remanded to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for subsequent action.

Case Overview

Case Number: 18F-H1817002-REL-RHG

Forum: The Office of Administrative Hearings, Phoenix, Arizona

Petitioner: Brian C. Herbert

Respondent: Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Presiding Judge: Diane Mihalsky, Administrative Law Judge

Key Development: Settlement and Hearing Vacation

The primary catalyst for the case’s disposition was a mutual agreement between the parties.

Settlement Reached: The document explicitly states that the parties “have reached a settlement.”

Joint Motion: Following the settlement, the attorneys for both the Petitioner and the Respondent filed a joint motion to vacate the hearing on the merits of the case.

Hearing Canceled: The order formally vacates the “continued hearing that had been scheduled on January 5, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.”

Judicial Orders and Disposition

On January 3, 2018, Judge Diane Mihalsky issued two definitive orders that concluded the proceedings at the Office of Administrative Hearings:

1. Order to Vacate: The first order vacates the hearing scheduled for January 5, 2018. The document states: “IT IS ORDERED vacating the continued hearing that had been scheduled on January 5, 2018, at 8:30 a.m.”

2. Order to Remand: The second order remands, or sends back, the matter to a different state body for final processing. It specifies: “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED remanding this matter under A.A.C. R2-19-111(3) to the Director of the Arizona Department of Real Estate for further action.”

Parties and Legal Representation

The following table details the key individuals and firms involved in the legal matter.

Name/Entity

Legal Counsel

Law Firm

Contact Information

Petitioner

Brian C. Herbert

Jeffrey D. Harris, Esq.

Titus Brueckner & Levine, PLC

jharris@tbl-law.com
8355 East Hartford Drive, Suite 200, Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Respondent

Blackstone at Vistancia Community Association

Stewart F. Salwin, Esq.
Lydia A. Peirce Linsmeier, Esq.

Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen, PLC

stewart@carpenterhazlewood.com
Lydia.Linsmeier@carpenterhazlewood.com
1400 E. Southern Ave., Suite 400, Tempe, AZ 85282

Administrative Details

Order Date: The order was issued on January 3, 2018.

Transmission: The document was transmitted on January 3, 2018, by “M.Aguirre” via mail, email, or facsimile.

Recipients of the Order:

Arizona Department of Real Estate:

▪ Judy Lowe, Commissioner

▪ Additional staff: jlowe@azre.gov, LDettorre@azre.gov, AHansen@azre.gov, djones@azre.gov, DGardner@azre.gov, ncano@azre.gov

Legal Counsel: All attorneys listed in the table above.