Briefing Doc – 17F-H1616006-REL
Briefing Document: DeBoer vs. Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association
Executive Summary
This document summarizes the findings and outcome of the legal dispute between homeowner Richard A. DeBoer and the Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association (HOA). The central issue was the HOA Board of Directors’ practice of conducting votes on non-emergency matters via email, which the petitioner alleged violated Arizona’s open meeting laws.
An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for the State of Arizona concluded that the HOA Board did violate state law (A.R.S. § 33-1804) by using email to approve the purchase of new street lights and the removal of existing fixtures, thereby circumventing requirements for open meetings accessible to all members. The Board’s defense, that it had relied on poor advice from its management company, was not sufficient to overcome the violation.
Consequently, Mr. DeBoer was declared the prevailing party. The HOA was ordered to cease this practice, pay a $1,000 civil penalty to the Arizona Department of Real Estate, and reimburse Mr. DeBoer for his $500 filing fee. The ALJ’s decision was formally adopted by the Commissioner of the Department of Real Estate, making it a final administrative order.
Case Background
• Case Name: Richard A. DeBoer vs. Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association
• Case Numbers: 17F-H1616006-REL (Office of Administrative Hearings), HO17-16/006 (Department of Real Estate)
• Jurisdiction: The dispute was filed with the Arizona Department of Real Estate and heard by the Office of Administrative Hearings.
• Petitioner: Richard A. DeBoer, a homeowner.
• Respondent: Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association, located in Phoenix, Arizona.
Key Dates
August 23, 2016
Petition filed by Richard A. DeBoer.
December 19, 2016
Hearing held before the Office of Administrative Hearings.
January 9, 2017
Administrative Law Judge Decision issued.
January 12, 2017
Final Order issued by the Department of Real Estate Commissioner.
January 13, 2017
Compliance letter sent to the HOA by the Department of Real Estate.
February 11, 2017
Deadline for HOA to show proof of payment for petitioner’s filing fee.
March 13, 2017
Deadline for HOA to pay the civil penalty.
Petitioner’s Allegations
Richard A. DeBoer’s petition, filed on August 23, 2016, alleged that the Turtle Rock III HOA Board of Directors had a “common practice” of conducting unnoticed email meetings to vote on non-emergency matters. This practice was alleged to be in violation of both Arizona state law and the HOA’s own bylaws.
• March 2016: The Board conducted an email vote to approve the purchase and installation of four high-mast street lights in the common area.
• April 2016: The Board conducted an email vote to approve the removal and sale or disposal of fourteen large, iconic, architectural light fixtures from the common areas.
• The email meetings were not open to all association members.
• Members were denied the opportunity to attend and speak before the Board took formal action.
• The subject matter did not meet the criteria for a closed meeting.
• The Board failed to provide members with at least 48 hours’ advance notice.
• The meetings did not qualify as emergency meetings.
• Proper notices and agendas containing information “reasonably necessary to inform the members” were not provided.
• The petitioner alleged the actions were contrary to Turtle Rock III Bylaws, Division VI, Item 2.i, which incorporates Robert’s Rules of Order.
• Specifically, the email meetings were conducted without authorization in the bylaws and failed to provide for “a single official gathering in one room or area.”
• The format lacked the required “conditions of opportunity for simultaneous aural communication among participating members.”
Respondent’s Defense and Testimony
The Turtle Rock III HOA initially filed an answer denying all allegations made in the petition.
During the hearing on December 19, 2016, the following testimony was provided on behalf of the HOA:
• Verl Curtiss (Board President) and Steve Pilcher (Board Treasurer) both acknowledged that the email votes regarding the lighting had occurred.
• Their defense centered on the claim that they had been advised by their management company and manager that their actions were not in violation of Arizona statutes or the HOA’s bylaws.
• Mr. Pilcher testified that they believed they had received “good advice.”
Legal Findings and Conclusion
The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Tammy L. Eigenheer, determined that the petitioner bore the burden of proving the violation by a “preponderance of the evidence.”
The decision focused on A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), which states:
“Notwithstanding any provision in the declaration, bylaws or other documents to the contrary, all meetings of the members’ association and the board of directors… are open to all members of the association… and all members or designated representatives so desiring shall be permitted to attend and speak at an appropriate time during the deliberations and proceedings.”
Based on the evidence and testimony, including the Board’s admission that email votes took place, the ALJ issued a clear conclusion:
“This Tribunal concludes that the Board’s prior practice of taking action in the absence of a meeting by obtaining unanimous written consent of the Board’s members via email violated the charged provisions of A.R.S. § 33-1804(A).”
Final Order and Penalties
The ALJ’s Recommended Order was officially accepted and adopted as a Final Order by Judy Lowe, the Commissioner of the Arizona Department of Real Estate, on January 12, 2017. The HOA was ordered to undertake the following actions:
1. Cease and Desist: The Respondent must comply with all applicable provisions of A.R.S. § 33-1804(A) in the future.
2. Fee Reimbursement: The Respondent must pay the Petitioner, Richard A. DeBoer, his filing fee of $500.00 within thirty (30) days of the Order.
3. Civil Penalty: The Respondent must pay a civil penalty of $1,000.00 to the Department of Real Estate within sixty (60) days of the Order.
The Final Order constituted a final administrative action, subject to appeal or a motion for rehearing within 30 days.
Key Parties and Officials
Name/Entity
Richard A. DeBoer
Petitioner / Homeowner
Turtle Rock III Homeowners Association
Respondent
Verl Curtiss
President, Respondent’s Board of Directors
Steve Pilcher
Treasurer, Respondent’s Board of Directors
Goodman Law Group
Respondent’s Representative
Tammy L. Eigenheer
Administrative Law Judge
Office of Administrative Hearings
Adjudicating Body
Arizona Department of Real Estate
Regulatory Agency / Jurisdiction for HOA Disputes
Judy Lowe
Commissioner, Department of Real Estate
Abby Hansen
HOA Dispute Coordinator, Department of Real Estate
